Showing posts with label Kenny Hulshof. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kenny Hulshof. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

AP: Judge Sharply Criticizes Hulshof

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) - A southeast Missouri man convicted 15 years ago in a college student's murder is set free by a Cole County judge.
Circuit Judge Richard Callahan ruled Tuesday that Joshua Kezer was wrongly convicted in the 1992 death of Angela Mischelle Lawless. She was found in her car on the Interstate 55 exit ramp
near Benton with the motor still running.
The judge's 44-page ruling sharply criticizes the courtroom conduct of former state special prosecutor Kenny Hulshof.
Hulshof later served as a six-term Republican congressman from Columbia. He lost the 2008 governor's race to Democrat Jay Nixon.

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

There's Always More To The Story

***A Behind-The Scenes-Look At 3 Memorable Political Stories in 2008***

There's always more to the stories political reporters write and broadcast. Often times, the backstory is even more rich and entertaining. Here's a look at what leads up to what you end up seeing on the air, or reading in print.

1. "IS HE DROPPING OUT?" It was the G.O.P's Springfield edition of Lincoln Days and all the pols were still abuzz from the fallout of Matt Blunt's decision not to run for re-election. The shuffling had begun. We had set up an interview on that Friday afternoon at University Plaza with presumed candidate Peter Kinder. The interview was set for a bit before 4 p.m. As we got rolling, the first nonchalant thing out of my mouth, as I found my page in my notebook was, "So you're obviously a candidate for Governor." Kinder didn't really respond. That ended up to be telling. It also ended up teaching me a lesson. As the interview continued, I asked him about what separates him from Kenny Hulshof and Sarah Steelman, and Kinder was increasingly vague in his answers. I didn't really think of anything of it, other than he didn't want to be bashing opponents so soon on the eve of a big G.O.P. dinner. When the interview was over, I headed back to the station to begin to log it. I didn't plan on heading back to the banquet, set to start around the 7 p.m. hour. "They won't say anything they wouldn't in a press release," I thought. Plus, we had a photographer shortage that night, so resources were skim. "A one-on-one would be better anyway," I assumed. Sitting at my desk, pondering my lead sentence for my Kinder story, my phone rang. "Dave, are you down here?," said a Republican staffer. "Down where?," I asked, a little caught off guard. "At the Plaza . . " "No," I replied. "Why?," noticing the urgency in his voice. "You should get down here . . . There's going to be a major announcement from Kinder," the staffer went on. "What? Whattta ya mean? Is he dropping out?," I pressed. "Can't say. I just wanted to give you the heads up, you probably should get down here quick," the staffer answered. "Ok, thanks, I appreciate it," I said, before slamming down the phone. "Sh*!," I said to my producer Brian. "I gotta go back. Kinder's going to drop out!," I told him as I gathered my coat and paged my photographer. The promo was already written and running for tonight's 10 p.m. -- Hear why the Lieutenant Governor wants a promotion . . . Tonight on KY3 News @ 10. I thought to myself, "seriously? I just talked to him." Somehow we made it back to University Plaza in time for Kinder's speech, which is now part of history. But I was pretty steamed. He had done an entire interview with me, leading me to believe he was candidate for Governor. Then, three hours later, he drops out. He had to know at that time that he was calling it quits, and never gave me any hint of it. The more I thought about it, the more I kick myself for not clearing asking, "So, are you a candidate for Governor?" But, to me it was still inexcusable that he mislead me. We ended up canning the outdated Kinder interview and just ran a soundbite of his decision to drop out at 10. Afterwards, still miffed, I went back to University Plaza, where all the Republicans were mingling in room parties. I finally spotted Kinder mingling and glad-handing with the party faithful. Many were thanking him "for doing the right thing." But his most loyal supporters and staffers, still seem shell-shocked from it all. Some of women with "Team Kinder" shirts on still had red eyes from the tears they had shed. When I finally confronted the Lieutenant Governor, he told me he didn't want to talk about it now, that he was not doing interviews. After my follow-ups had been ignored, and feeling a bit like a party crasher, I began to head out. As I moved closer to the door, a hand tapped me on the shoulder. It was Peter Kinder. "Look, that's just how it had to be, David," he said. "There's a time and a place for these things, and I had to do it that way." I argued a little, but I got his point. Still, with the knowledge this was coming, I just didn't understand why he or his staff let him do the interview with me in the first place. I didn't like being duped by a pol, but I respected him for on second-thought, trying to explain himself. But now there's a running joke in the newsroom. Every time Kinder schedules a news availability, someone snidely says, "he'll probably just back out of it . . . especially if Kit Bond's around."

2. "IT'S A FAKE POLL!" In the frenzied Republican primary race for Governor, Sarah Steelman's campaign knew perfectly well their effort was uphill. As the race slogged into the summer and Steelman continued to slug Hulshof on the airwaves, I was looking for data. Poll numbers. When I asked both sides about the horse race in June, both agreed that Hulshof was winning. The question always was whether it was a race. I had been asking for real numbers for awhile, and on June 12th, campaign manager John Hancock had delivered as promised. It showed Hulshof up 39%-26% with the rest undecided. More interesting were the internals on the spreadsheet. The internal had Hulshof up in southwest Missouri, 37%-34%. After giving Team Steelman the same opportunity to provide numbers, I published Hulshof's numbers on the blog. I also included them in a horse-race piece for TV. The Steelman entourage thought I was nuts. "That's a fake poll, Dave! Are you kidding me," said one rabid Steelman backer in a phone call. "They're feeding you bulls%^*. They just typed that up for you. It's probably screened." "Well, then show me what you got," I replied. No deal. Team Steelman's philosophy was: Why would we give our numbers to a reporter? They are for us. We paid for it. I replied: "You give them to a reporter to stop the inevitability argument that Hulshof is trying to create. If you really say you are down by only single-digits, prove it." They declined. "Dave, you're soooo naive," one repeatedly told me. "And they say they're up in Springfield! That's crazy, (insert big expletive) crazy!" Then, about a month later in July, after a public poll revealed that Steelman polled slightly better against Jay Nixon than Hulshof, Hulshof's spokesperson called to tell me not to read too much into it. He also bluntly told me their internals had them up by 10 over Steelman. To the blog it went. This infuriated Steelman's side even more. All along they believed they were closing the race (which they were), and now less than a month away, Hulshof's team is boasting double-digits again. Most of this was daily insider political junkie theatre. But the intensity of Team Steelman's behind-the-scenes response to the poll battle was ferocious. Push back is what you might call it. In the end, Steelman did close well -- but time ran out. A few days before the primary, Hulshof's Scott Baker asked me to predict the spread in an e-mail. I wrote him back: Hulshof by 4. That's about the spread he won by on August 5th. For once, I predicted not only the winner, but the spread. If you don't believe me, call Scott Baker.

3. "THE OBAMA FLIER" One day in late October, I walked into the newsroom and was presented with a story idea my executive producer seemed pretty excited about. A viewer had sent in a flier with Barack Obama's picture plastered on a $100 dollar bill, with the labels "socialist," "In Ahla We Trust" and "Food Stamps" all over it. The viewer said she had picked it up at Christian County Republican headquarters in Nixa. I was immediately skeptical. "She probably got it from some crazy outside in the parking lot," I said in our meeting. Nevertheless, it was worth looking into. Figuring that Christian County Republicans might suspect something was up if I pulled into their office, we decided to send a producer to go see if she could actually pick up one of these fliers inside the HQ. An hour later, she phoned back saying she walked right in and took some out. I couldn't believe it. "Dave, it IS Christian County," said one of my colleagues, who had lived here longer than me. Now I had a decision to make. Do I call the headquarters and inquire? I felt, for these type of allegations, this close to an election, that was too standard. So we went to the ambush technique, something I seldomly use. But in this case, after consulting some of my colleagues, I believe it was warranted. Myself and an intrepid photographer would walk right into the headquarters and stick a microphone in someone's face without asking first. Basically, it's being a hardcore, obnoxious a-hole. It's how reporters used to do it. Now, you're out of line. Disrespectful. Again, I don't believe it should be used regularly -- until a politician or group gives you reason to. This seemed to rise to that standard. The Obama flier was outrageous, no mater how you felt about him or his policies. So, we walked right into the quiet headquarters, with camera rolling and microphone in hand. I noticed a young guy spot us and sneak out the back. Another female staffer came around the corner. She was the victim of my onslaught. "Can you tell me why these fliers are in here? Are these approved by the Republican Party? Who paid for them? Do you believe Barack Obama is a Muslim? Are these really appropriate . . .? I went on . . . and on . . . The girl, who probably is in her early to mid 20s, looked stunned. Understandably, she stammered for a bit. She then just kept repeating that she was just a worker. Finally, breaking into tears, she screamed, "Please leave." That's when it hit me, and I felt bad. I walked out, having done what I had came there to do. Probably knowing in the back of my head I wasn't really there to get an answer, but rather pelt some GOPer with questions to prove the absurdity of the flier. It would make good TV, but also prove a point. But on the drive back, I wondered, "Had I gone too far?" "Was I too tough?" Another person who was in the office at the time, who defended the flier, also told me I was a jerk "for doing that to the girl." Then there was another Republican who said he disagreed with the tactics, and told me to "keep up the good work." My photographer was wondering as well. I wasn't even back at my desk 10 minutes, when my cell phone was ringing. It was state G.O.P. spokeswoman Tina Hervey. Wonder what this could be about? In the middle of deconstructing the events to my news director, I let it go to voicemail. Hervey was pretty upset with me. When I called her back, she said I had no right to throw a mic in some volunteer's face who had no control over the flier. But to be fair, Hervey also seemed personally disgusted by the flier. She just thought the way I went about the story was wrong. She argued that I should have come to her first, and not barge into the local G.O.P. I said someone needed to own up to this. I told her that if we tipped her off, she would have made sure the fliers were gone before someone even commented. We went back and forth. But she went ahead and got in touch with the Christian County G.O.P. chair to call me. She wanted to make the point that he should be owning up to this "racist flier" and not some low-level twenty something. The chair had been on vacation, but in a phone interview, he finally admitted that he permitted the fliers to be placed at headquarters. He said it was poor judgment. But now I had to determine if my combative clips with this staffer would run in my big lead story at 10 p.m. Hervey was lobbying furiously against it. She said this volunteer shouldn't be seen as the villain for something she had little to do with. "She worked in the office they were being distributed in," I retorted stubbornly. "Didn't she have some responsibility for what's coming out of the office?" But I was caught up in the moment. Hervey was probably right. The two-minute piece on the Obama flier was complete, but after a long night of constructive back and forth with Hervey, I decided to kill even the small 3 seconds of sound I had inserted for what we call in the business "natural sound color." The clips would have made the viewer at home immediately sit up and pay attention, but it was not worth dragging this volunteer into it. And to be honest, the story was strong enough on its own. Score a victory for Hervey. If it was an elected official or even a crotchety old man, the clip might have stayed in. But we journalists do have compassion for other people, and despite our critics, we do deeply think about the consequences of our actions.

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Decision '08: Hulshof Concedes

Kenny Hulshof concedes the race for Governor at 9:40 p.m. Central. He has called Jay Nixon.

Also, Hulshof is losing Greene County to Jay Nixon:

KENNY HULSHOF (REP) . . . . . . . 22,281 40.24%
JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON (DEM). . . . 31,348 56.61%

Decision '08: Hulshof Loses Laclede County

A smart reader passes this along to give us some insight on how bad Hulshof is losing:

In Laclede County, where John McCain defeated Barack Obama 67% to 32%; Hulshof lost to Nixon. Hulshof ran 20 points behind John McCain here.

Here are the raw numbers from Laclede:

Jay Nixon 51% (8,241 votes)
Kenny Hulshof 47% (7,601 votes)

Decision '08: Explaining The Loss

The scene at Kenny Hulshof's election night watch party in Columbia via KY3's Marie Saavedra and Doug Magditch. Hulshof campaign manager John Hancock meets with reporters after the A.P. calls the race for Nixon.

Decision '08: 2 Hours Til Closing Time

Mood at Nixon HQ in St. Louis is very upbeat.

Former Chief Justice Ronnie White says heavy turnout bodes well for Jay Nixon. White says he'll be looking at St. Louis County first. St. Louis county went for Kerry 54%-45%; McCaskill carried it against Blunt 55%-44%. Dems feel if Nixon can hit 59% to 60% in this county, he can produce a big margin over Kenny Hulshof.

Lines in St. Louis are long. There are reports of a 6 hour wait in Velda City, Mo.

Asked what would surprise him tonight, Former Gov. Roger Wilson tells KY3 News, "if Barack Obama wins Missouri" or wins it by a couple of points.

Another note: It may take awhile to get results, not necessarily because a state is close, but because people will still be in line long after 7 p.m. after the polls close. And results can't be reported when people are still in line waiting to vote.

Decision '08: Scene Setter

STAGE IS SET
Jay Nixon's Election Night Party at The Pageant in St. Louis
It's mostly crews just getting lights, cameras, gear in place.
But the room looks big and the bar looks stocked.

Ky3's Marie Saavedra reports from Columbia that Kenny Hulshof's election night room is much smaller.

Now the expectation games begin . . . HOW
BIG OF A MARGIN?

Here's a shot of where I voted at 9:10 a.m. this morning. It's Seminole Baptist Church on Republic Road in South Springfield.

Sunday, November 02, 2008

Kit Cool on Steelman's Future

KIT ON KENNY & SARAH

On Republicans voting for Nixon because they're upset with how the establishment got involved in the primary: "That's really sad, that's so sad. I've never been a spoiled sport."

On Why Hulshof's Had Problems Gaining Traction: "He's been carved up by people supporting his opponent."

On Whether Sarah Steelman Has A Future In The G.O.P.: "Everybody's going to have to make their own decision."

Closing Arguments: Jay vs. Kenny

I WANT TO VOTE WHERE HE'S TALKING ABOUT

"The lines are going to be long, not so much in some of the other precincts, where they'll drive up in their Lexus Limousines and be offered their martinis and a rubdown to vote . . ."

--- Jay Nixon, speaking to supporters at Barack Obama's rally Saturday night

HULSHOF MOCKS "CHANGE" ARGUMENT

"Ran against Jack Danforth in 1988 and the voters said no. Ran against Kit Bond in 1998 and Missouri voters said no . . . Maybe just like cicadas, every 10 years it's time to return Jay Nixon to the private sector, once and for all."

--- Kenny Hulshof, speaking to supporters at the Springfield Expo Center Saturday evening about Jay Nixon's previous failed campaigns.

ALSO: Look at the picture above. Notice what's missing? A Hulshof for Governor banner. The candidates for Lieutenant Governor and Attorney General get prominent banner placement, but not Hulshof?

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Hulshof Challenges Nixon on Numbers


?________$
"NIXON SHOULD FILL IN THE BLANKS"
Republican Kenny Hulshof challenges his Democratic opponent on what his agenda would cost Missouri taxpayers.
***
"The people of Missouri deserve to know the price tag that comes with a Nixon Administration," said Scott Baker, spokesman for Hulshof. "If he believes our numbers to be inaccurate, he should provide his own estimates. The fact is he cannot and will not, because he knows Missouri cannot afford his plans. It is time for Jay Nixon to finally come clean with Missourians."
***
Nixon's proposed plan to restore the 2005 Medicaid cuts is calculated to cost $265 million dollars. His A+ scholarship expansion is estimated to cost $61 million. Hulshof's campaign says Nixon still hasn't detailed specific costs for expanding early childhood education, increased teacher pay, job training programs, providing incentives for alternative fuels and other proposals he's promised.
***
Nixon toured a green supermarket and store in Springfield Wednesday. During the campaign stop, he did not outline a specific plan to create incentives for more businesses to "go green."

Wooten Explains Support For Nixon

"TRIED TO CALL HIS PEOPLE, HAD NO LUCK"

Republican Chuck Wooten explains to KY3 News what lead to his decision to support Democrat Jay Nixon over Republican Kenny Hulshof in the race for Governor. The former 5-term state representative from the 137th legislative district says Nixon's willingness to help him pursue veterans issues sealed the deal. Wooten says he attempted to reach out to the Hulshof campaign, but never heard back. "Tried to call his people and had no luck," Wooten says of attempted contacts with Team Hulshof.

***

Wooten says he believes there's a lot of Republicans crossing over to support Nixon because of how the Republican establishment got involved in the primary race. "Lots of Republicans feel that the state committee should not have gotten involved in the primary," Wooten says. "It's made lots of Sarah Steelman people mad, that they're switching over to Jay Nixon."

***

ALSO SAYS, Nixon can work both sides of the aisle, and believes the Attorney General has a shot at winning Greene County.

***

Wooten attended a campaign even with Nixon Wednesday in Springfield.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

What If

10 THINGS HE SHOULD HAVE DONE
1. Three to five days after the primary, aggressively reached out to Sarah Steelman and planned a big rally at G.O.P. Headquarters in southwest Missouri, where supporters of both would have come together, downplayed differences, and readied for the battle ahead. Made sure the shot of the two clenching hands over head got on the front page of the paper and the evening news. (Also told her, you got my back this time, I got you next time. . .)
2. Apologized for the earmarks. Not the Bridge To Nowhere necessarily, but the Lobster Institute, the Hippie Museum, etc. Said Congress got out of control, and it was wrong, but that "I tried to be a good Congressman by getting projects for my district." Then went on to say, the issues ahead are much bigger than earmarks (with Steelman begrudgingly nodding beside him on the stage.)
3. Used Kit Bond and Roy Blunt more -- to rally the faithful. They were his horse in the primary, where have they been since? Why aren't they advocating for him more? Bond is stumping this weekend for Hulshof in Kansas City, but why not in Branson and Nixa? Why did these two G.O.P leaders seem more worried about Hulshof winning the primary than the general?
4. Hit Nixon hard in August. Begun with the contrast ads immediately. Fifteen seconds on "Clean Government" Kenny, Fifteen seconds on Nixon's actions that raise some ethical eyebrows. Make the narrative about trust. Repeat same theme.
5. Not ignore Springfield/Southwest Mo. for more than 7 days at a time. (He did for 27 days!) We know where the voters are in the St. Louis and Kansas City suburbs, but he didn't win this area in the primary. Show up once a week, and get on TV making a clear contrast with Jay.
6. Rolled out his job plan at least two weeks earlier than he did.
7. Said once, as plainly as he could, "Matt Blunt did some good things, he did some things I don't agree with, but I'm not Matt Blunt. I'd be a different Governor, with a very different approach."
8. Find a tracker as aggressive and resilient as Vinay Vaz. Probably not, but who knows, Nixon might've popped if he felt some pressure. Plus, then he's never too comfortable.
9. Used Renee more. She's a rockstar who knows TV.
10. Hulshof's biggest advantage over Steelman was his oratory skills. The guy's a good speaker. Put him in big halls, VFWs, senior centers. Bring in 20 to 40 people. Create a rally atmosphere, with good applause lines. Then walk across the street to the diner, and shake hands until it hurts.
(The above items are a compilation of analysis that didn't solely come from my head. Keep in mind, I'm not so lofty to assume that even if Hulshof did all of these things, he could have won. These are rather a summation and combination of views and opinions I have heard and picked up after speaking to numerous Republicans on the topic over the past week.)

C-SPAN 2 to Replay Nixon-Hulshof Debate Tonight

Not kidding this time.
Watch the Debate @ 7 p.m. Tonight

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Sunday Morning Brew

OZARKS TODAY: SUNDAY POLITICAL ANALYSIS

BELOW: Watch my chat with KY3's Abby Wuellner about the KY3 Debate for Governor, the strongest points each candidate made and what races could keep us up late this election night.


Also: Ozarks Public TV will replay the KY3 Debate for Governor Sunday @ 5 p.m.


Or, the entire debate is divided up into healthy portions on ky3.com

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Post-Debate Thoughts

Both Kenny Hulshof and Jay Nixon held brief press conferences after the KY3 Debate Friday.

Below are highlights:

Hulshof: Nixon"Lacks Transparency, Lacks Specifics, Playing It Safe"

Hulshof charged that Nixon's Attorney General office has shown a "lack of transparency" over the years, and cited audits by Democratic Auditors Claire McCaskill and Susan Montee to back up his claim. Specifically, Hulshof criticized Nixon for the use of a state car during campaign events. He then went on to blast Nixon's lack of specifics on issues. "Investing in human capital, wonderful soundbite. What does it mean?," asked Hulshof. "When you have very few bold ideas, you do what's politically safe."

Nixon: Hulshof's Numbers "Jump Around", "Doesn't Get" Impact of China Trade

Nixon took Hulshof to task for "jumping around," on the costs of their respective proposed plans. He says Hulshof's programs add up to around $750 million dollars, while his only cost a bit more than $300 million, yet Hulshof charges Nixon can't pay for his. Also says: "We don't know exactly how much money is in the till." He went on to target his Republican opponent on his pro-trade vote with China, which Nixon believes cost Missouri 45,000 jobs. Finally, Nixon specifically detailed how he would change the "single occurrence" portion of Missouri's worker compensation law.

Friday, October 24, 2008

Their Final Debate

NIXON vs. HULSHOF
Missed It? Wanna Watch Again?
It's HERE
***
Watch the KY3 News @ 10 Post-Debate Coverage HERE

Last Stop: The Big House

SUPPORTERS FACE-OFF OUTSIDE KY3
DEBATE @ 8 p.m.

KENNY HULSHOF vs. JAY NIXON
OUTSIDE THE VIEWING AREA?
CATCH IT ON C-SPAN 2







Frenzied Friday

THE SARAH PALIN VISIT
@ Bass Pro Shops
Program Begins 11 a.m.
Palin To Speak @ Noon
Check HERE for LIVE Twitter Updates
WATCH KY3 NEWS @ NOON


McCASKILL RESPONDS
The junior Senator will hold a town hall meeting at 1:40 p.m.
@ Missouri State University's Kentwood Hall
Watch KY3 News @ 5 & 6 for FULL REPORTS



THE DEBATE
Kenny Hulshof & Jay Nixon Face-Off
8 p.m. Live on KY3 News
Also Carried Nationally On C-Span




WATCH KY3 NEWS @ 10
For the Full Day Political Wrap-Up

DEVELOPING . . .

(All Day!)



Thursday, October 23, 2008

The Nation Will Be Watching

DEBATE REHEARSAL
HAPPENING NOW . . .
Jay Nixon and Kenny Hulshof will debate at KY3 Studios Friday @ 8 p.m. LIVE
ALSO: C-SPAN will carry the debate LIVE so if you aren't in the Ozarks, you can still check it out.

More Bad Tape

"You live in the city . . .? . . . I meant what nationality?"
DEMS RELEASE MORE VIDEO OF TRACKER ENCOUNTER
***
An unknown individual assaulted Missouri Democratic Party tracker Vinay Vaz at a G.O.P. event in West Plains Tuesday.
***
Kenny Hulshof's campaign has said "it's a ridiculous claim," to say the assailant has ties to them.
***
In video, unknown individual also refers to "20 Hulshof meetings."
Adds: "Are you going to follow us over to the next one? Because we're going to go there too."