Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Shane Schoeller Aims To End Roark Legacy

Republicans privately say this was supposed to be the year Shane Schoeller finally got his due, easily cruising to the G.O.P. nomination in the 139th legislative district.

But now Schoeller is locked in a 3-way primary race, where one of his opponents carries a popular political name in the district.

Schoeller is running against Karen Roark, Rep. Brad Roark's mother, and media consultant Joe Pyles.

I got to catch up with Schoeller today as he was going door-to-door in the 139th. Refreshingly, Schoeller wouldn't say anything even close to disparaging about either of his G.O.P. rivals. He seems not to hold a grudge or take anything for granted. Instead, he focused on issues and experience.

"The main difference is experience. I have it on the federal, state and local level," Schoeller said referring to his work for John Ashcroft, Kit Bond and both Matt and Roy Blunt.

"Karen Roark is running a good race. Joe Pyles is a nice man, very friendly," Schoeller said.

Schoeller said he spoke to Rep. Brad Roark about his mother running and said there were no hard feelings on either side. "I said to Brad, that's what's great about our country. Anybody can run," Schoeller recalled.

Just a note . . . I have contacted several top G.O.P. officials about ways to get in touch with Karen Roark to get her views. I have not received calls back yet. Any tips on how to get in touch with Ms. Roark would be greatly appreciated. Maybe I'm just bad at tracking down campaign sites?

Regarding Pyles, Schoeller said he believes he is more conservative than Pyles. "I think Joe may be a little more moderate than I am. I don't know if that's the message for this district. It's fairly conservative."

Here's Schoeller on the issues:

Medicaid Cuts - He'd vote to reinstate the MAWD program for working people with disabilities, but wouldn't say the Medicaid cuts went too far. "I think it is a smart investment to give the working disabled a chance to work. Anytime you have reforms, unfortunate things happen, I understand that."

Special Session - He'd only support a special session to reinstate Medicaid if it was held during the veto session so it wouldn't cost taxpayers any extra money.

Minimum Wage Hike - He said he'd only support a minimum wage hike as part of a larger package that would include tax breaks for businesses. "That's the only circumstance I'd support it," Schoeller said.

Stem Cell Amendment - He is against the stem cell initiative because he said it's a controversial proposal that destroys human life. "It's not a smart choice for Missouri. I certainly believe an embryo is a human life. Adult stem cells offer so much more results." What about embryos that are going to be discarded anyway? Schoeller is against using any type of embryos for research. "Once you do that, you hit a slippery slope. My position is firm on these issues."

License Fee Office Reform - This may be a touchy topic for Schoeller because his wife operates a fee office in Nixa. He said he does not yet have a position on Rep. Mark Wright's plan to change the way the offices are awarded and run. "I haven't taken a position, I'd have to see the details but so much has been mischaracterized about these license offices. Unfortunately it has become an issue, but for me it is already out there. My wife has one office in Nixa, but we didn't ask for it. We were approached about running it and I encouraged my wife to do it. People rarely ask me about it, most aren't interested in it."

Biggest Issue for #139 Voters - Iraq . . . You read it right, Iraq. Of all the issues Schoeller hears about, he said he gets the most questions, comments and concern about the war. As a potential state lawmaker, Schoeller obviously doesn't have much control over that issue, but he said that's what people want to talk about. "People have a lot of different opinions, but overall they want victory, a conclusion, some type of closure."

Here's his campaign website . . . http://www.electschoeller.com/
I appreciate the heads-up on it. As much as I googled and tried other searches, I couldn't find it.

Schoeller said while Roark has name identification, his biggest strength is organization. "I feel like I've done all the things necessary to win this race," Schoeller said. But he admits that getting people energized about voting in the middle of vacation season is difficult. "It's very hard in a primary. I hear people all the time say, 'When's that election again?,'" Schoeller said.

Of all the politicians he has worked for Schoeller said he's learned the most from his four years serving as a legislative aide to Rep. Roy Blunt. "He helped me set priorities and figure out what can and can't be done," Schoeller said. "I learned the most important thing is keeping your word to people. If you can't help them, you have to tell them that. It's better to tell them instead of telling them you'll look into it and you never get back to them. People will respect that," Schoeller said.

Candid comments from what seems to be a solid candidate for the G.O.P. in the 139th.

This primary may come down to how much a name is worth.

10 comments:

Askinstoo said...

Hey! Very Nice! Check out this website I found where you can make extra cash.
It's not available everywhere, so go to the site and see if you can find something. I found something and make
and extra $900 a month!

http://www.degree-programs-online.info/extramoney.htm

maverickthinker said...

Shane is a class act and a good man. Here's hoping he wins.

busplunge said...

I find his statement about being approached to run the fee office almost beyond belief.

We all know the fee offices are political plums given as reward for services rendered, be it democrat or republican. You have to want it to get it.

I was with this guy until that statement.

Tim said...

(It is "Democrat" or "Republican". Capital letters are free!)

Shane is a man of high integrity, and shame on you for the implied slur.

bobicus tomatocus said...

I agree with Tim. If I lived in that district Shane would be my vote.

I know Karen from eons ago. Her and her husband Larry are great people, but I my vote would go to Shane. He is definitely a class act.

smoothsailing said...

Shane's comments are too unbelievable. I certainly don't want a Rep. that thinks I would believe he wasn't expecting payback. Of course that goes both ways. He now owns a very big debt back to Blunt. I have never even seen Karen Roark. Pyles gets my vote!

busplunge said...

OK, Tim, Democrat or Republican.

Schoeller worked for Bond, Roy Blunt, Ashcroft, Matt Blunt, Rod Jetton and the license office just fell out of the sky.

How come it didn't go to the guy next door to me who has voted Republican all his life?

How come the lady who used to run the office (Martin?) doesn't still have it?

These offices are awarded as political favors and don't try to kid anyone by saying they are not.

I don't know Schoeller or his wife, but it strains his credibility with me when he says he or his wife didn't seek the fee office.

Don't pour water down my leg and tell me it is raining.

Takes two wings to fly straight said...

I should have known Bobicus would support Shane the fee agent who was awarded the profits from our
motor vehicle fees in Nixa for his many years of blind loyal service to the extreme elements who have overtaken the Republican Party. Meanwhile he also wants to be the Reresetnative for Willard. Is no one in Nixa qualified to run the Nixa fee agent office? Of course there is. The school system could run the office and keep the profits to fund the school. Is no one with long term Willard ties running to be the state representative for the area?
Of course there is. Roark, Schoolcraft and Pyles both have long time tie to the area.
So why should a political insider get both jobs?

Tim said...

Petty.

bobicus tomatocus said...

@one wing: Schools are meant to teach kids somthing. Lets try to shoot for that goal first, alright? Anything else is silly and shows how absurdly PC the idea is.

Secondly, if you read my personal proposal regarding the fee stations, it is to open it up completely to the market system. Why should the fee offices be any different than any other type of tax? If someone feels like they can run the office better, then let them!

I would propose that there is a licensing and regulation process to make sure businesses know what they are doing, but beyond that, let private business take care of the system.