UNRELENTING ON SPENDING
TEAM STEELMAN UP AGAIN WITH ANOTHER AD HITTING HULSHOF ON EARMARKS
AD BUY CALLED "BIG" . . . Running in Springfield & Joplin . . . Not St. Louis yet
"The Spending Issue Is Giant," claims one adviser
1. Is the Steelman campaign overestimating the resonance "out-of-control" Washington spending has with primary voters or is the Hulshof campaign underestimating it?
2. How does the Hulshof campaign attempt to change the campaign storyline, which has been dominated by the Steelman camp for at least the last two weeks?
3. When does taking "the high road" not look as good anymore? (And: Is Steelman's side willing to venture any "lower?")