You ask, why do I obsess with such trivial numbers so often?
Because, just like our weather radar, it's the best system we got.
John McCain 25%
Rudy Giuliani 20%
Fred Thompson 16%
Newt Gingrich 12%
Rudy Giuliani 22%
Newt Gingrich 15%
Mitt Romney 10%
John McCain 9%
(Here's a perfect reason why polls are so screwy. Two different polls, taken in the same state, with about the same sample, at about the same time, are producing drastically different results. Look at the difference in McCain's support. Yet, Gingrich, notably looks strong in both. Does the absence of Thompson in the Insider poll matter?)
Barack Obama 31%
Hillary Clinton 27%
John Edwards 16%
Rudy Giuliani 29%
John McCain 15%
Mitt Romney 14%
Hillary Clinton 42%
Barack Obama 19%
John Edwards 12%
Finally, I'm not a big one on national surveys. Because, frankly, our system is state-by-state - not a national popular vote. And momentum from wins in key states is immeasurable. But this grabbed my attention. Newt Gingrich grabs 13% in a national G.O.P. primary. David Brooks has already predicted that Newt will pull off an upset in Iowa and shake up the race -- for a week.
1 comment:
Running with the weather radar analogy...
sometimes, even those who are experts in radar interpretation can get it wrong. =)
The weather keeps on rolling no matter what though...
Good post.
Post a Comment