What are the major distinctions in the State Auditor race as far as the Sandra Thomas campaign is concerned?
Thomas campaign manager Ryan Johnson says basic political philosophy will be key. "I think you will notice distinct difference in their basic political philosophy. For instance, Sandra Thomas is a fiscal and social conservative whereas Ms. Montee is much more liberal on fiscal and social issues," Johnson said.
Johnson also points to experience and awards. "Thomas has nearly 12 years of experience as a County Auditor. Montee is just finishing her first full term. Thomas has received nine consecutive national awards for her performance in her office. Montee has zero. Thomas has served in all the leadership roles in the Missouri Association of County Auditors. Montee has not. Thomas was named the Outstanding CPA in Government by her peers in the Missouri Society of CPAs (MSCPA). Montee was not. Thomas is supported by CPAs from around the state. Montee is supported by trial lawyers and labor unions," Johnson said.
"Ms. Montee in my opinion will be a mini-McCaskill that spends more time on political grandstanding than pursuing the duties of the office," Johnson added.
1 comment:
Another Claire? Didn't she get easily reelected to auditor last time she ran? Is there any doubt Claire would have been reelected Auditor if she had wanted to be? Does Thomsas mean she to infer Montee will be easily elected Auditor?
Claire's favorables for her performance as Auditor are very high in every poll I've seen. If Thomas keeps calling Montee another Claire she will be assuring Montee's election. With Blunt's favorability numbers does Thomas really think MIssouri voters want someone who will be less aggressive in monitoring the Governor's activities?
Post a Comment